5 years ago
Fortunejack arbitrarily permanently closed my account. I requested an explanation, particularly in light of me depositing 5LTC. See attachments for their lack of explanation. I cited their terms and conditions below. And they still provided no Explanation. At this point, I do not want my account reopened. I simply want my deposit back.
AskGamblers
5 years ago
• Support Team
Based on all that has been stated in the complaint thread and player's unwillingness to sent written consent to the casino, AskGamblers Complaints Team has no other option but to reject this complaint upon submitter's unwillingness to cooperate. In case of a disagreement with our decision we recommend player to seek further assistance on the matter from the relevant regulatory body.
The case is now officially closed.
Inactive user
5 years ago
I am contacting my attorney today and will respond by Saturday. I am also investigating the ALLEGED spam abuse perpetrated by Fortunejack on this website for “multi-accounting” positive reviews by employees. Anyone reading this complaint should read through Fortunejack’s positive reviews and recognize the ALLEGED obvious spam bot reviews.
FortuneJack Casino
5 years ago
• Representative
Dear @KOENIG83,
Unfortunate to see you unhappy regarding the decision of ours. However, FortuneJack as a casino needs to strictly follow Terms and Conditions, more specifically to this case, prohibiting multi account holders as it’s the only way for the Casino to maintain healthy gambling environment in general. There are many customers trying to operate parallel accounts for the purpose of unrightfully influencing their gambling needs. We need to accordingly take an action to keep things organized and fair to every single player.
Fraud Control and Prevention Department of FortuneJack has collected all the proofs to back our decision and would like to share it privately to @askgamblers custom support team. Mentioning once again, the proofs might contain some of the sensitive data on your digital footprints and we would like to ask for your permission prior sharing it individually to the askgamblers official representatives.
Regarding how the term multi-accounting is referred in FJ’s Terms and Conditions:
[PLEASE SEE THE PICTURE ONE]
As per askgambler’s request, our team is willing to provide the proofs showcasing several account holders sharing the same IP.
With reference to the user about having the bug within the transactional system, FortuneJack’s T&C clearly states that
[PLEASE SEE THE PICTURE TWO]
We believe that the above-mentioned statements are enough to have this case considered as closed. Regardless, we’re more than welcome to read the upcoming response from @KOENIG83.
Unfortunate to see you unhappy regarding the decision of ours. However, FortuneJack as a casino needs to strictly follow Terms and Conditions, more specifically to this case, prohibiting multi account holders as it’s the only way for the Casino to maintain healthy gambling environment in general. There are many customers trying to operate parallel accounts for the purpose of unrightfully influencing their gambling needs. We need to accordingly take an action to keep things organized and fair to every single player.
Fraud Control and Prevention Department of FortuneJack has collected all the proofs to back our decision and would like to share it privately to @askgamblers custom support team. Mentioning once again, the proofs might contain some of the sensitive data on your digital footprints and we would like to ask for your permission prior sharing it individually to the askgamblers official representatives.
Regarding how the term multi-accounting is referred in FJ’s Terms and Conditions:
[PLEASE SEE THE PICTURE ONE]
As per askgambler’s request, our team is willing to provide the proofs showcasing several account holders sharing the same IP.
With reference to the user about having the bug within the transactional system, FortuneJack’s T&C clearly states that
[PLEASE SEE THE PICTURE TWO]
We believe that the above-mentioned statements are enough to have this case considered as closed. Regardless, we’re more than welcome to read the upcoming response from @KOENIG83.
Inactive user
5 years ago
Furthermore, if there is or was in fact a “bug” that affected players’ interests, and you have not yet revealed said bug to the public, but instead attacked individual players affected by said bug, then you have violated your own privacy policy and T&C. Askgamblers and the community should report this lack of transparency to the appropriate law agency(ies).
FortuneJack Casino Complaint Stats
Resolved
71 / 73
Avg. Amount
$7,965
Avg. Complaint Duration
7 days
Avg. Response Time
2 days
Screenshot