Withdrawal Blocked by Impossible Verification Requirement And Unfair Handling
I would like to submit a complaint regarding Bitcoincasino.io’s handling of my recent withdrawal request.
I had a $2,000 NZD withdrawal pending.
The casino rejected the withdrawal 2 times and demanded a PDF Paysafe statement.
My Paysafe account was closed/deleted in June, and Paysafe support confirmed in writing that:
- PDF statements cannot be generated for closed accounts,
- no transaction history can be retrieved,
- no documentation is available.
Despite this, the casino refused to offer any alternative verification method. Support agents stated:
“This document is not up for negotiation or debate. It is required.”
I provided all possible evidence, including:
- bank card ownership
- email confirmation of each Paysafe purchase
The casino still refused, insisting on a document impossible for me to obtain.
This left me unable to complete verification through no fault of my own.
Serious Issue:
Only after my $2,000 balance was gone, the casino suddenly advised me that a bank statement PDF was acceptable. This contradicted all previous messages claiming that only a Paysafe PDF was valid.
This raises concerns because:
- The “mandatory” document was not actually mandatory.
- The casino refused reasonable alternatives while the withdrawal was pending.
- The alternative verification of supplying a simple bank statement PDF was only offered after the funds were lost. (Which I’m sure was their goal)
- Their delay and refusal directly caused financial loss. I tried withdrawing that $2000 multiple times.
- Verification must be reasonable, possible, and proportionate under fair-play standards.
- Requiring an impossible document violates these principles.
I am requesting compensation credit or a refund of my deposits to this casino, because the withdrawal was rejected by an impossible requirement and procedures that were not applied fairly. Proof of paysafe purchases via bank statement PDF should have been offered to me from the get go.
I had a $2,000 NZD withdrawal pending.
The casino rejected the withdrawal 2 times and demanded a PDF Paysafe statement.
My Paysafe account was closed/deleted in June, and Paysafe support confirmed in writing that:
- PDF statements cannot be generated for closed accounts,
- no transaction history can be retrieved,
- no documentation is available.
Despite this, the casino refused to offer any alternative verification method. Support agents stated:
“This document is not up for negotiation or debate. It is required.”
I provided all possible evidence, including:
- bank card ownership
- email confirmation of each Paysafe purchase
The casino still refused, insisting on a document impossible for me to obtain.
This left me unable to complete verification through no fault of my own.
Serious Issue:
Only after my $2,000 balance was gone, the casino suddenly advised me that a bank statement PDF was acceptable. This contradicted all previous messages claiming that only a Paysafe PDF was valid.
This raises concerns because:
- The “mandatory” document was not actually mandatory.
- The casino refused reasonable alternatives while the withdrawal was pending.
- The alternative verification of supplying a simple bank statement PDF was only offered after the funds were lost. (Which I’m sure was their goal)
- Their delay and refusal directly caused financial loss. I tried withdrawing that $2000 multiple times.
- Verification must be reasonable, possible, and proportionate under fair-play standards.
- Requiring an impossible document violates these principles.
I am requesting compensation credit or a refund of my deposits to this casino, because the withdrawal was rejected by an impossible requirement and procedures that were not applied fairly. Proof of paysafe purchases via bank statement PDF should have been offered to me from the get go.