Mark all as read

Settings

Notifications
Casino Complaints

Withdrawal cancelled due to unjustified "Minimal risk" accusations


I opened an account which had a bonus £10 which needed to be staked 99x in order for me to be able to withdraw. Within about an hour id got it up to £500, and had met the stake requirement, and so made my withdrawal. 3 days later I receive an email saying they have checked my history and seen that I was placing "minimal risk" bets and removed my bonus. Now I would have completely understood this if I had been staking £200 on red or £200 on black to get my total stake up, but I wasn't. I was putting chips on numbers, and on multiple occasions I lost my entire stake for certain bets, and I am baffled as to how they could possibly say I have been making minimal risk bets. One hour of playing and got £10 to £500, doesn't quite seem like a minimal risk? Some bets did have a large amount of numbers covered, but I think that is to be expected when staking over £100, and many of the possible results would have still resulted in a loss on that spin, and so I would like to know how they could have understood this as not taking enough risks.
Disputed Casino Super Casino
Amount £10

Discussion

User name
After a careful consideration of all the evidence provided to us by the casino management, we can confirm that player covered more than 80% of roulette table, which consider a "irregular play", you can see in the casino's rule # 17.1.5:

All variants of roulette games also contribute 100% towards requirements with the exception of any minimal risk wagering such as even money outside bets or any other bet placements designed to cover the majority of numbers on the roulette wheel in order to reduce the risk of the wager. Users who have used minimal risk wagering tactics in order to redeem their bonuses may have their bonuses, cash prizes and any subsequent winnings removed from their account.

Casino confirms that player's deposit was returned. Upon evidence and casino's T&C we consider this complaint resolved.

If submitter still believes that his rights were infringed, we would like to remind him that further assistance in this case can be asked in front of the casino's licensing authority.
User name
Hi,

The definition of "minimal risk" is available within the bonus terms. This definition is what is used to determine whether the bets are considered "minimal risk". In the player's case it is clearly demonstrated that the bets were consistently minimal risk bets - and therefore the winnings were removed due to the player not adhering to the bonus terms. We have many players who are lucky and who win from bonuses - provided they have played within the terms of the offer they are eligible for the winnings.

We would like to reiterate that players are free to choose to play with or without a bonus. If they choose to play with a bonus they should make themselves aware of the bonus terms prior to commencing wagering.

Kind Regards,

SuperCasino
User name loyalty-level-2
As I stated before, the bets were not minimal risk as many of the covered numbers were insignificant stakes that would have resulted in a loss - I am sure that the statistics will show that my bets were not designed to increase my total stake for the withdrawal requirements and were in fact very risky. I think this simply comes down to the fact that I was lucky, my numbers came in, and you are unhappy that I was successful in the promotion - judging by virtually all of the other complaints on AskGamblers I am clearly not the first person that has had a problem with SuperCasino and a significant withdrawal.
User name
We have provided evidence to AskGamblers which shows the player's bets. As mentioned in our previous response, the player's bets consistently covered not just the majority but over 80% of the table. Unfortunately this is a breach of the bonus terms and as such the player's withdrawal was declined. The player's deposit of £10 has been returned to their balance.

We understand some players prefer to play without bonuses and associated terms - which is why we give the player the option of opting out of bonuses when joining. When playing with cash, players can bet on any game and exactly as they wish. They will win cash which they can withdraw at any time. If a player does choose to take a bonus we do urge them to read & understand the bonus terms before starting to wager.

Kind Regards,

SuperCasino

Super Casino Complaint Stats

Resolved 55 / 62
Avg. Amount $3,288
Avg. Complaint Duration 11 days
Avg. Response Time 3 days

Super Casino Complaints

See all complaints for this casino
Delayed Payment due to Prolonged Verification
I created my account in 2012. At the time, I went through a simple verification process of providing ID and evidence of the cards used to deposit. I verified and everything was fine. In August/September I started using the account again and on 4th sept I was asked to provide evidence of my ID and a bank statement showing my address. I did this and was paid £900 that i withdrew. I deposited £300 and withdrew £1200 last Saturday. I then withdrew £3119 on Sunday. On Monday I then withdrew £113. I waited and waited and nothing. On Tuesday, I contacted the casino and was told that I was supposed to be contacted by “Jack” and I needed to provide more documents. I found this strange and frustrating because 1. I’ve only just verified my documents 2. I should have been contacted with this request I was given a lame excuse that it is to ensure I have the funds to gamble with (please note, I question why they were quick to accept my deposits without question, but only now query whether or not I can afford to gamble when I try to withdraw money). I provided the requested documentation on Wednesday at around 1.15pm. I got a reply on Thursday saying that my payslip was not accepted. I need to provide more information. I have resent copies of my payslips (I work for an independent business where my pay is calculated on an A4 sheet of paper, no official SAGE slip, I am self employed so I do not have tax codes etc) with proof of the monies being paid into my bank account. I have phoned SuperCasino countless times and I am fobbed off saying they can’t give me any information or discuss the verification process. I am a VIP so I am currently being dealt with and verified, still no correspondence, still no money. I have requested their complaints details, nothing. Still, this is the 5th working day and NOTHING! I feel I am being sent on a wild goose chase so that I don’t receive the money and I want to complain, know my next steps with regards to finally getting my withdrawal or refund of all deposited monies, or seek compensation at this stage.
Status solved Resolved
£4,432