Background of Play:
My account activity has been entirely recreational, consisting of fair gameplay across a variety of different bets. Just prior to this issue, on Apr 7-2026, my account underwent a manual review by their security department . I was explicitly informed that my account was in good standing. Nothing in my betting patterns or account status changed between my regular play and then after 48 hours of this review, sudden block, which makes this restriction arbitrary and unjustified.
Support Failure:
I contacted support to resolve this and waited over 96 hours for a response. When they finally replied, they provided no explanation or evidence of any terms-of-service violation. Instead, they simply stated the matter was "closed" and told me that further communication must come through "formal legal representation."
Request for Resolution:
I have acted in good faith and have been a consistent user of the platform. Telling a player to hire a lawyer for a €200 support inquiry regarding a recreational account is an unethical stalling tactic.
I request:
A clear explanation and proof for the account closure given my history of fair, recreational play.
The immediate release of my remaining balance of approximately €200.
An explanation as to why the account was blocked immediately after a period of normal, cleared activity.
Dear all,
Following a careful review and consideration of all the information, details and/or proof presented by the parties during the complaint process, the AskGamblers Complaint Team reached the conclusion that Gamdom Casino management acted in accordance with their Terms and Conditions.
Based on the abovementioned information, the AskGamblers Complaint Team considers this case resolved and it is now officially closed. While we understand this might not be the outcome expected by the complainant, we would like to remind you that, in case of a disagreement with our decision, further assistance on the matter could be requested from the relevant regulatory body and/or appointed ADR entity.
Thank you for the update. I maintain that I am a legitimate player and I categorically deny both of the accusations brought forward by Gamdom.
Regarding Point 1: Unfair Advantage Play
Gamdom's claim remains completely vague. Stating that a "game provider reported it" without providing the specific game, the exact bets, or the supposed "manipulation" strategy makes it impossible for me to defend myself. I play standard games according to the rules provided. I ask the AskGamblers team to heavily scrutinize whatever report has been provided privately. If there is genuine evidence of manipulation, the specific mechanics of this alleged exploit should be shared transparently.
Regarding Point 2: Multiple Linked Accounts via IP Address
I do not own, control, or have access to any other accounts on Gamdom. Finding a matching non-VPN IP address is not definitive proof of "linked accounts" or coordinated behavior. It is incredibly common for multiple people to share the same public IP address due to shared living environments, university networks, or local Internet Service Providers that use dynamic IP allocation and Carrier-Grade NAT (CGNAT).
An IP match alone does not equal account collusion. If Gamdom reviews the actual underlying data—such as device fingerprints, KYC details, payment/withdrawal methods, and individual betting patterns—they will see there is no connection between me and any other user. I have only ever used my own details and my own funds.
Because Gamdom has chosen to share their "extensive" evidence privately, I am relying entirely on the AskGamblers Complaint Team to objectively verify if this evidence genuinely proves coordinated abuse, or if it is merely circumstantial data (like a shared local ISP) being used to justify confiscating my legitimate winnings.
I respectfully ask AskGamblers to hold the casino to a high standard of proof.
Dear @nitin42,
Rest assured that the AskGamblers Complaint Team is in contact with the Gamdom Casino team and your case is being handled accordingly. Updates will be provided in due course.
Thank you for understanding.
We would like to follow up on this case and provide the available evidence on our end.
Following a thorough review, the account in question has been found to have committed multiple breaches of our Terms of Service.
1. Unfair Advantage Play
The account was found engaging in advantage play, as confirmed by a report from one of our game providers. This is explicitly prohibited under our terms: "Cooperation with others to manipulate game outcomes, exploit promotions, or gain an unfair advantage."
2. Multiple Linked Accounts
We have identified multiple accounts linked via the same IP address, confirmed as non-VPN. This is a clear breach of our Multiple Accounts policy (Section 2.3), which states that each user is permitted to hold only one active account. Our IPL promotion is also valid once per user and per household.
As outlined in Section 6.3 of our Terms of Service: "If we detect Multiple Accounts, or suspect that a bonus offer has been misused either individually or as part of coordinated behaviour we may take appropriate action to ensure the fairness and integrity of our promotions. This may include revoking access to active bonuses, reversing associated winnings, restricting future promotional eligibility, suspending and/or closing any Accounts involved in a breach of these T&Cs or of regulatory obligations. We monitor promotional activity to maintain fair play."
In line with this, the bonus funds have been confiscated. No deposit funds were taken, only the promotional bonus winnings.
We would appreciate it if this could be reviewed by your team. We are also willing to share this evidence directly with the user, given how clear and extensive the breach is across multiple areas.
All relevant details and attachments have been provided to the AskGamblers team via email, and we hope to bring this to a fair resolution given the evidence shared on our end.
Gamdom Support Team
Gamdom Casino Complaint Stats
Screenshot