3 weeks ago
Dear AskGamblers Complaint Team,
I am writing to file a formal complaint against 22bet.
Ticket number 84215685793
Bet details:
Match: France vs Morocco (FIFA World Cup 2026 Quarter-final, 09 July 2026)
Market: Hit the Woodwork (Crossbar or Goalpost hit)
The bet was lost / voided because 22bet claims there was no woodwork hit according to their statistics.
My issue:
According to 22bet’s own rules, bets are settled using official sources. For the FIFA World Cup 2026, the official betting data provider is Opta / Stats Perform (RunningBall). There was at least one (or more) hit on the crossbar or post during the match, which is visible in multiple match reports.
Lucas Digne hits the post on 45+2 and the whole world see the post.
22bet has not provided any official Opta data or FIFA match report to support their decision. They are relying on their internal statistics, which contradict what actually happened on the pitch.
My request:
I ask that 22bet re-check the bet using the official Opta / Stats Perform feed and pay the winnings if a woodwork hit occurred, as per their rules and industry standards.
Attachments I will provide:
Screenshot of the bet ticket
Screenshot of 22bet’s response
Links to match reports (WhoScored, ESPN, etc.)
Thank you in advance for your assistance
https://www.fifa.com/en/match-centre/match/17/285023/289289/400021536?gender=2&date=2026-07-09
I am writing to file a formal complaint against 22bet.
Ticket number 84215685793
Bet details:
Match: France vs Morocco (FIFA World Cup 2026 Quarter-final, 09 July 2026)
Market: Hit the Woodwork (Crossbar or Goalpost hit)
The bet was lost / voided because 22bet claims there was no woodwork hit according to their statistics.
My issue:
According to 22bet’s own rules, bets are settled using official sources. For the FIFA World Cup 2026, the official betting data provider is Opta / Stats Perform (RunningBall). There was at least one (or more) hit on the crossbar or post during the match, which is visible in multiple match reports.
Lucas Digne hits the post on 45+2 and the whole world see the post.
22bet has not provided any official Opta data or FIFA match report to support their decision. They are relying on their internal statistics, which contradict what actually happened on the pitch.
My request:
I ask that 22bet re-check the bet using the official Opta / Stats Perform feed and pay the winnings if a woodwork hit occurred, as per their rules and industry standards.
Attachments I will provide:
Screenshot of the bet ticket
Screenshot of 22bet’s response
Links to match reports (WhoScored, ESPN, etc.)
Thank you in advance for your assistance
https://www.fifa.com/en/match-centre/match/17/285023/289289/400021536?gender=2&date=2026-07-09
Disputed sportsbook
22bet Sportsbook
Reason
Wrong official result
AskGamblers
2 weeks ago
• Support Team
Dear all,
Following a careful review and consideration of all the information, details and/or proof presented by the parties during the complaint process, the AskGamblers Complaint Team reached the conclusion that management acted in accordance with their Terms and Conditions.
Based on the abovementioned information, the AskGamblers Complaint Team considers this case resolved and it is now officially closed. While we understand this might not be the outcome expected by the complainant, we would like to remind you that, in case of a disagreement with our decision, further assistance on the matter could be requested from the relevant regulatory body and/or appointed ADR entity.
22bet Sportsbook
2 weeks ago
• Representative
Dear kresimirv,
We would like to clarify that the rules for sports betting are available in our Terms and Conditions, specifically in section 9 “Rules on Sports”, clause 9.25 “Football”.
Players are responsible for reviewing the applicable betting rules before placing a bet. By placing a bet, the player agrees to these rules and accepts the settlement conditions stated there.
We would like to clarify that the rules for sports betting are available in our Terms and Conditions, specifically in section 9 “Rules on Sports”, clause 9.25 “Football”.
Players are responsible for reviewing the applicable betting rules before placing a bet. By placing a bet, the player agrees to these rules and accepts the settlement conditions stated there.
2 weeks ago
Dear 22BET Complaints Team,
Thank you for the explanation.
I understand the rule you described. However, there is an important issue with how the bet is presented to the customer.
When I selected the bet, the market was displayed simply as:
"Pogodak u gredu ili vratnicu" / "Hit the post or crossbar" – Yes / No
There was no additional information, footnote, warning, or clarification stating that the hit only counts if the ball remains in play afterwards, or that it does not count if the ball goes out of bounds.
This condition was not visible or mentioned anywhere at the moment of placing the bet. This makes the market very misleading and confusing for players.
I will attach the example of this kind of bet with possibilities to bet on your website.
I kindly ask you to reconsider the settlement of this bet, taking into account that the restrictive rule was not properly disclosed at the time the selection was made.
Thank you for your understanding and prompt review.
Thank you for the explanation.
I understand the rule you described. However, there is an important issue with how the bet is presented to the customer.
When I selected the bet, the market was displayed simply as:
"Pogodak u gredu ili vratnicu" / "Hit the post or crossbar" – Yes / No
There was no additional information, footnote, warning, or clarification stating that the hit only counts if the ball remains in play afterwards, or that it does not count if the ball goes out of bounds.
This condition was not visible or mentioned anywhere at the moment of placing the bet. This makes the market very misleading and confusing for players.
I will attach the example of this kind of bet with possibilities to bet on your website.
I kindly ask you to reconsider the settlement of this bet, taking into account that the restrictive rule was not properly disclosed at the time the selection was made.
Thank you for your understanding and prompt review.
22bet Sportsbook
2 weeks ago
• Representative
Hello kresimirv,
We would like to clarify the rules regarding shots hitting the post or crossbar.
According to the applicable terms, only those shots hitting the post or crossbar are counted where the ball remains in play afterward, meaning it touches a player, the referee, another post, or the crossbar.
A post or crossbar hit is not counted if:
the game had already been stopped before the ball hit the post or crossbar;
after hitting the post or crossbar, the ball went out of play;
after hitting the post or crossbar, the ball went into the goal and a goal was awarded.
Regarding the episode mentioned you, Lucas Digne’s shot at 45+2 does not qualify under these rules, as the ball did not remain in play after hitting the post. Therefore, this moment is not counted according to the applicable terms.
We would like to clarify the rules regarding shots hitting the post or crossbar.
According to the applicable terms, only those shots hitting the post or crossbar are counted where the ball remains in play afterward, meaning it touches a player, the referee, another post, or the crossbar.
A post or crossbar hit is not counted if:
the game had already been stopped before the ball hit the post or crossbar;
after hitting the post or crossbar, the ball went out of play;
after hitting the post or crossbar, the ball went into the goal and a goal was awarded.
Regarding the episode mentioned you, Lucas Digne’s shot at 45+2 does not qualify under these rules, as the ball did not remain in play after hitting the post. Therefore, this moment is not counted according to the applicable terms.
22bet Sportsbook Complaint Stats
Resolved
32 / 32
Avg. Amount
$1,238
Avg. Complaint Duration
11 days
Avg. Response Time
2 days
Screenshot