Refusal to pay winnings due to twisting of term in wagering
On the 01/04/2019 i deposited £100 for bcasino'a 50% deposit bonus found here: https://www.bcasino.co.uk/promotions/daily-reload-bonus/?lang=en&desktop=true.
I started spinning on a medium variance slot called Gonzo's quest, regularly advertised over numerous casinos globally. The slot is such a regular i assumed it would not have any rules around wagering contributions.
I was spinning at £4 spins and hit a couple of nice wins getting my balance to over £1,000. I decided to check my wagering progress for the bonus, and then noticed that it was in fact only contributing 10% to my wagering progress, something i normally only see on blackjack or super high variance slots like dead or alive.
I did not try to abuse the system in any way by hiding money in blackjack, or slot bonuses. I simply switched to a slot of similar variance and spin size. I believe it was Jackhammer 2 at £5 spins. I finished wagering at a balance of £1,750. i was sent a verification request the next day and sent photos of my bank card. It was accepted and everything seemed fine until i recieved another email stating that i had broken a term in their terms and conditions for wagering. A term designed to stop people multiplying their balance via blackjack, roulette or other means that they had twisted because i simple switched from one slot to another of very similar variance and RTP. It seems a blatant backhanded excuse to avoid paying out a winning customer.
I have held detailed discussions with their customer service and they refuse to budge on this matter. So have let them know i will be raising this with you as an external dispute. I can send you any further information if and when you require it.
Many thanks,
Tom
I started spinning on a medium variance slot called Gonzo's quest, regularly advertised over numerous casinos globally. The slot is such a regular i assumed it would not have any rules around wagering contributions.
I was spinning at £4 spins and hit a couple of nice wins getting my balance to over £1,000. I decided to check my wagering progress for the bonus, and then noticed that it was in fact only contributing 10% to my wagering progress, something i normally only see on blackjack or super high variance slots like dead or alive.
I did not try to abuse the system in any way by hiding money in blackjack, or slot bonuses. I simply switched to a slot of similar variance and spin size. I believe it was Jackhammer 2 at £5 spins. I finished wagering at a balance of £1,750. i was sent a verification request the next day and sent photos of my bank card. It was accepted and everything seemed fine until i recieved another email stating that i had broken a term in their terms and conditions for wagering. A term designed to stop people multiplying their balance via blackjack, roulette or other means that they had twisted because i simple switched from one slot to another of very similar variance and RTP. It seems a blatant backhanded excuse to avoid paying out a winning customer.
I have held detailed discussions with their customer service and they refuse to budge on this matter. So have let them know i will be raising this with you as an external dispute. I can send you any further information if and when you require it.
Many thanks,
Tom