Breaking their TOS
I had a dispute with Sportaza where, in my view, they did not follow their own Terms & Conditions.
I placed a player prop bet: Player Over 1.5 Shots on Target SOT. The player did not start the match (was not in the starting XI) and only came on as a substitute. According to Sportaza’s published rules, player statistics markets (including player shots / shots on target) should be settled as VOID if the listed player is not in the starting lineup (stake returned). This is stated in their T&C, section 16.6.8.
Despite that, my bet was settled as LOST. I contacted support and they replied: “the player did not start from the first minute but he played in this match” and that they “cannot do more.” This response ignores the relevant clause in their own rules and they refused to correct what appears to be an incorrect settlement.
This experience seriously damages trust. I recommend being cautious and keeping screenshots of the bet slip and official lineups if you use this bookmaker.
I placed a player prop bet: Player Over 1.5 Shots on Target SOT. The player did not start the match (was not in the starting XI) and only came on as a substitute. According to Sportaza’s published rules, player statistics markets (including player shots / shots on target) should be settled as VOID if the listed player is not in the starting lineup (stake returned). This is stated in their T&C, section 16.6.8.
Despite that, my bet was settled as LOST. I contacted support and they replied: “the player did not start from the first minute but he played in this match” and that they “cannot do more.” This response ignores the relevant clause in their own rules and they refused to correct what appears to be an incorrect settlement.
This experience seriously damages trust. I recommend being cautious and keeping screenshots of the bet slip and official lineups if you use this bookmaker.