Mark all as read

Settings

Notifications
Casino Complaints

Unprocessed Withdrawal Timeframe passed


Dear AskGamblers Team,

I am filing this complaint against Mr.Bet Casino due to an unjustified delay in processing my withdrawal. I was explicitly told by their support team that my withdrawal would be processed within a 48-hour timeframe. However, that time has already passed, and my funds are still pending.

I am particularly concerned because I had a similar negative experience in the past where a deliberately prolonged verification process caused me to cancel my withdrawal and lose my winnings. It feels like this is another delay tactic. I want to make it absolutely clear that I will not fall for this again, and I will not cancel this withdrawal under any circumstances.

I kindly request your assistance in getting Mr.Bet to honor their stated processing times and release my funds immediately.

Thank you for your time and help.
Disputed Casino Mr.Bet Casino
Amount $7000

Discussion

User name

Dear @cotamurillod,

Following a careful review and consideration of your case, the AskGamblers Complaint Team reached the conclusion that, unfortunately, your complaint is not compliant with the AGCCS Guidelines, section Balance played off while waiting to be paid and, therefore, is being rejected. Please keep in mind that following all AGCCS Guidelines is mandatory.

Please keep in mind that while we can understand your frustration and disappointment of probably not being paid within the time frame specified by the operator, it is up to you to refrain from playing until the processing of your payment is finalized accordingly. Instead, you kept playing and lost your balance subsequently which means that unfortunately, you will also lose the validity of your claim against the operator which led to the rejection of the complaint.

And while we understand this might not be the outcome expected by the complainant, we would like to remind you that in case of disagreement with our decision further assistance on the matter could be requested from the relevant regulatory body and/or appointed ADR entity.

User name loyalty-level-1
Dear AskGamblers Team and Mr.Bet Representative,

I am not disputing what the support agents told me, nor am I disputing that rule 3.7 exists. My complaint is about the ethics and transparency of the system design itself.

Mr.Bet’s defense relies entirely on blaming the player, but it ignores a few critical points:

Warnings Do Not Excuse Unfair Mechanics: Telling a player "your withdrawal is unprotected and mixed with your playable balance" does not justify the casino's refusal to simply lock the funds like a standard, reputable operator.

Misleading Deductions: I intended to use my active bonus balance for shop/loot box interactions. The system confusingly deducted from the real-money balance instead. This lack of clear segregation is what caused the balance to drop and triggered the automatic cancellation.

The "Limits" Argument: A player should not be forced to manually set account restrictions just to protect a pending cashout from the casino's own confusing 48-hour exposure window.

I understand that Mr.Bet will hide behind their Terms and Conditions to justify keeping the funds. However, hiding behind terms does not make a practice fair or transparent.

I maintain that this system is designed to force automatic cancellations. I am still open to resolving this amicably and fairly with the casino, but this complaint stands as a clear public record of how Mr.Bet's withdrawal mechanics operate.
User name
Dear AskGamblers Team,

The user agreed to all of the site’s terms and conditions prior to registration. As previously noted, the user repeatedly contacted our support team to expedite the withdrawal process, where he was informed about the processing times and that his funds would remain available for play; he was also told that if his balance fell below a certain amount, the withdrawal requests would be canceled. In one of these chats, the user even stated that he “had no intention of touching his balance.” In other words, the user effectively confirmed that he understood the risks of losing his balance if he continued playing. Additionally, the user had the opportunity to utilize the limits available to him to ensure his own safety. The user also agreed to Rule 3.7 When placing bets, you may lose some or all of the money you have deposited with the Service in accordance with these Terms, and you will be fully responsible for that loss.

Therefore, given the facts outlined above, the user could have chosen not to use their active balance, but they consciously chose to continue playing; consequently, their balance was reduced, and their withdrawal requests were canceled.
User name

Dear Mr.Bet Casino,

Please let us know if there are any updates regarding this ongoing complaint.

Please note that, in case you fail to respond within the given timeframe, we will consider your case unresolved and it will be closed accordingly.

Thanks in advance for your cooperation.

Mr.Bet Casino Complaint Stats

Resolved 184 / 187
Avg. Amount $3,868
Avg. Complaint Duration 10 days
Avg. Response Time 2 days

Mr.Bet Casino Complaint Summary

Most user complaints about this operator fall under the Payment category.
So far, 164 out of 167 complaints in this category have been resolved.
This operator's average complaint duration is 10 days, while the average duration across all operators is 8 days.

Mr.Bet Casino Complaints

See all complaints for this casino
Withdrawals blocked since June 2026 by an unresolvable verification requirement
I have 5,797,512.83 CLP in my account that I have been unable to withdraw. Four withdrawal requests have failed or remain unprocessed:

81173501, 900,000 CLP, requested 01/06/2026, status Failed
81957218, 100,000 CLP, requested 03/08/2026, status Failed
82212597, 850,000 CLP, requested 25/08/2026, still Pending
82212598, 50,000 CLP, requested 25/08/2026, still Pending
An earlier payout, reference 18188288, was cancelled by the operator

The stated cause is that my deposit payment method is not verified. That verification has been open since February 2026 and my documents have been rejected four times, on no occasion identifying which specific field failed.

The deposit in question is ID 79692236, 250,000 CLP, made on 08/02/2026 through WebPay, using a virtual Visa Prepaid card ending 0608 issued by MACH (Bci, Chile) in my own name.

The requirement cannot be met. Mr.Bet asks for a single document showing my full name together with the deposit details. My card issuer does not produce such a document. It produces three separate ones, all of which I have submitted: a monthly account statement showing my full name, account number and the 250,000 CLP charge; an in-app transaction detail showing the date 08/02/2026, the card ending 0608 and transaction number 603910013906; and the virtual card screen showing my full name and the card ending 0608. Together they establish every data point requested.

Mr.Bet has also asked for a receipt showing the word "WebPay". In Chile, WebPay is a payment gateway operated by Transbank, not a bank or a card, and it never appears as a merchant name on a bank statement. The charge appears under the payment processor, Payku, shown as "PK COMERCIOS EN LINEA". No Chilean bank issues a statement containing the word WebPay.

During a live chat on 11/09/2026, agent Eva confirmed that the verification page allows only one upload per payment method, asked me to send the second document through the chat, and stated she would forward it as an exception. On 17/09/2026 agent Juliet wrote that no document had been received for that method. I have the full chat transcript.

What I am asking for: that Mr.Bet process my pending withdrawals and release the balance of 5,797,512.83 CLP.

I have submitted every document Mr.Bet has requested, in the format its own agents instructed. If any further verification step is genuinely required, I remain available to complete it immediately, including a video call or a photograph of me holding the card alongside my ID. What I dispute is that my funds have been withheld since June 2026 over a documentary requirement that no Chilean bank can satisfy.

Account: rmlira
Chart Pointer
58h left
$5,797,513