Violation of Sports Betting Rules by 1win with Bet Settlement Error
Dear AskGamblers Support Team, I am writing to appeal/re-submit, as this is a clear violation of sports betting rules and settlement standards.Complaint Summary:Operator: 1win (sportsbook)
Bet type: Single bets on "To win the match, Barcelona FC" (explicitly the individual match winner – second leg of Copa del Rey semi-final vs Atlético Madrid, March 3/4, 2026).
Actual result: Barcelona won the specific match 3-0 in regular time (90 minutes + injury time; goals by Marc Bernal x2 and Raphinha penalty). Confirmed by independent sources (e.g., Marca live report: https://www.marca.com/en/soccer/spanish-copa-del-rey/barcelona-atletico/2026/03/03/01_0105_20260303_178_175-live.html; The Athletic, Al Jazeera).
1win settled all bets as "Lost", claiming aggregate score (4-3 to Atlético overall) applies per "football rules" for two-legged ties.
Specific Violation of Sports Betting Rules:
1win's own rules (https://1win.com/rules, football/sports sections) state:Match winner bets (P1/P2/X or "To win the match") settle on regular time (90 minutes + injury time) of the specific match.
Aggregate/extra time/penalties only apply to separate markets like "To Qualify (For The Next Round)" or progression/advance bets.
There is no provision overriding "To win the match" to aggregate in cup ties – the market wording controls settlement.
This is a direct violation of their published settlement rules. The bets should have been graded as Won at 7.5 odds.Bet IDs and Stakes:ID 210572019: Re 400.00
ID 210571595: Re 303.61
ID 210569563: Re 200.00
Total disputed winnings owed: Re 6,777.08 (full payout including stakes returned + profit).
Previous Actions:Contacted 1win live chat multiple times since March 4, 2026.
Agent "Anisha" acknowledged difference between "to qualify" and "to win the match" but still applied aggregate.
No resolution after days of follow-ups and emails to [email protected] / [email protected].
Bet type: Single bets on "To win the match, Barcelona FC" (explicitly the individual match winner – second leg of Copa del Rey semi-final vs Atlético Madrid, March 3/4, 2026).
Actual result: Barcelona won the specific match 3-0 in regular time (90 minutes + injury time; goals by Marc Bernal x2 and Raphinha penalty). Confirmed by independent sources (e.g., Marca live report: https://www.marca.com/en/soccer/spanish-copa-del-rey/barcelona-atletico/2026/03/03/01_0105_20260303_178_175-live.html; The Athletic, Al Jazeera).
1win settled all bets as "Lost", claiming aggregate score (4-3 to Atlético overall) applies per "football rules" for two-legged ties.
Specific Violation of Sports Betting Rules:
1win's own rules (https://1win.com/rules, football/sports sections) state:Match winner bets (P1/P2/X or "To win the match") settle on regular time (90 minutes + injury time) of the specific match.
Aggregate/extra time/penalties only apply to separate markets like "To Qualify (For The Next Round)" or progression/advance bets.
There is no provision overriding "To win the match" to aggregate in cup ties – the market wording controls settlement.
This is a direct violation of their published settlement rules. The bets should have been graded as Won at 7.5 odds.Bet IDs and Stakes:ID 210572019: Re 400.00
ID 210571595: Re 303.61
ID 210569563: Re 200.00
Total disputed winnings owed: Re 6,777.08 (full payout including stakes returned + profit).
Previous Actions:Contacted 1win live chat multiple times since March 4, 2026.
Agent "Anisha" acknowledged difference between "to qualify" and "to win the match" but still applied aggregate.
No resolution after days of follow-ups and emails to [email protected] / [email protected].