Failed self exclusion responsible gaming player protection
Dear AskGamblers Team,
I am filing a formal complaint against Monoplay (monoplay33824.com) for its negligent and, in my view, systematic mishandling of a clearly disclosed gambling-addiction self-exclusion request.
I suffer from a gambling addiction. On 1 July 2026 at 18:14, I emailed the casino's official support address (support@monoplay.com) and explicitly requested account closure due to my gambling addiction, stating plainly: "Please delete my account about my gambling addiction."
A responsible operator must treat such a disclosure as an emergency and freeze the account immediately. Monoplay did not. Instead, on 3 July 2026, they replied and simply redirected me to another address (customercare@monoplay.com) and pointed me to their Terms and Conditions. I resent the identical request on 3 July 2026 at 10:24, again clearly citing my gambling addiction.
What I find especially alarming is that Monoplay's own Terms and Conditions state that an account closure can take up to 10 days to process. This is unacceptable. For a self-declared problem gambler, a 10-day window is not an administrative delay – it is 10 days in which the operator continues to accept deposits and losses from a vulnerable person who has explicitly asked to be protected. A built-in 10-day delay for addiction-related closures is not a harmless clause; it is a mechanism that predictably extracts further money from at-risk players. This strongly suggests the problem is systemic, not an isolated error, and that the operator has designed its process in a way that prioritises revenue over player protection and its responsible-gambling duty of care.
During the period after my first exclusion request, I continued to make numerous Mastercard deposits and lost a substantial sum. My current balance is only €0.13.
I am therefore demanding:
Immediate and permanent closure / self-exclusion of my account
A full refund of ALL deposits made from my first exclusion request onward (1 July 2026), as every one of these was accepted after I had clearly disclosed a gambling addiction and requested closure
A review of Monoplay's self-exclusion process, in particular the "up to 10 days" clause, which I consider a breach of responsible-gambling obligations
I have full email evidence and deposit records (screenshots including transaction IDs) available on request.
I ask AskGamblers to treat this as a matter of player safety, not merely a payment dispute.
Kind regards,