I would like to clarify that I am not refusing to cooperate or provide verification documents.
1xBet has asked me to print and notarize public blockchain transaction records for a withdrawal of approximately $399. I have already provided the publicly verifiable transaction records and demonstrated that 1xBet previously processed a withdrawal to the exact same MetaMask wallet.
Obtaining notarized documents in Turkey may cost a substantial portion of the disputed amount, potentially exceeding the amount I am trying to recover. I have therefore asked 1xBet to clarify the exact notarization requirements and whether an alternative, such as a cryptographically signed message proving control of my wallet, would be acceptable.
I am willing to cooperate with reasonable verification measures. However, I believe it is reasonable to seek clarification before incurring potentially disproportionate costs for a document that may not even satisfy the operator's requirements.
I respectfully ask the AskGamblers team to help clarify whether an alternative verification method can be accepted before rejecting my complaint.
I have been trying to resolve this matter for over a month and remain committed to finding a practical solution.
Thank you.
Please be informed that the issue is currently undergoing an additional review by the responsible department.
We kindly ask you to allow us some more time to complete the necessary checks. We will provide an update as soon as further information becomes available.
Thank you for your patience and understanding.
Best regards,
1xBet Team
Dear @sarporhan2000,
The AskGamblers Complaint Team is kindly asking you to assist the team further and send the required verification paperwork.
Please keep in mind that as per the AGCCS Terms and Guidelines which you accepted upon registering and using our complaints system, you are obliged to provide the necessary level of assistance and cooperation during the process, therefore please make sure to confirm by posting the public message if you have provided requested information.
Should you refuse sending the required verification paperwork, or fail to confirm, we will have no other choice but to reject the case and recommend you forwarding it to the relevant regulatory body.
Thanks for your cooperation.
I find this requirement disproportionate to the amount in question. The disputed withdrawal is approximately $399, and obtaining notarized cryptocurrency transaction records in Turkey may cost a substantial portion of that amount, potentially more than the withdrawal itself.
More importantly, *1xBet has already successfully processed a withdrawal to the exact same MetaMask wallet.* Why was that withdrawal permitted if additional notarized documentation is now necessary to verify the same wallet?
I have already provided publicly verifiable blockchain transaction records. As an alternative, would you accept a message cryptographically signed using my MetaMask wallet to demonstrate control of the address, alongside the relevant transaction hashes? This would allow you to verify wallet ownership without requiring an expensive notarization.
I am willing to cooperate with reasonable verification measures, but the cost and practicality of the current requirement should be taken into account, particularly when the wallet has already been used successfully for a withdrawal.
Please explain why notarization is necessary in this case and whether a signed wallet-ownership message and the existing blockchain evidence would be accepted as an alternative.
I have been trying to resolve this for over a month. I would appreciate a practical solution that allows my remaining balance to be released without further unnecessary delays.
Thank you.
1xBet Sportsbook Complaint Stats
1xBet Sportsbook Complaint Summary
Screenshot