Markiere alle als gelesen

Einstellungen

Nachricht
Casino Beschwerden

Self exclusion with under casino with same licence


user_avatar badge
Von aussie201
vor 5 Jahren

Hi,


I have had issues with a number of casinos operating under N1 Interactive (licence holder) which owns and operates a variety of casino brands, one of which is Crazy Fox Casino. I initially requested to be self excluded on 26/3/20 on BobCasino which is a casino operating under the N1 Interactive MGA licence which also operates CrazyFox casino and received confirmation via email of the self exclusion. I also emailed support to request I be blocked from all casinos under their licence due to gambling problems however I have been allowed to open an account with crazyfox and deposit the following amounts


Crazyfox

500euro - 11/8/20

900euro - 11/8/20

500euro - 11/8/20

500euro - 8/8/20

1000euro-28/7/20

500euro- 28/7/20


I feel the Gaming operator’s responsible gambling system has severely failed me and my addiction was let take over and I lost control. I have contacted crazyfox by email and again emailed saying I wanted to close my accounts due to gambling issues but only then were all of my accounts deactivated across the N1 interactive casino network.


please see attached email from Bobcasino as proof of request to self exclude from all of their casinos.


Please note I have used the same credentials as my bobcasino account with crazyfox


Name: < removed >

DOB:< removed >

Address:< removed >

Unseriöses Casino Crazy Fox Casino
Grund Sonstiges

Diskussion

User name

Dear all,

Following a careful review and consideration of all the information, details and/or proof presented by the parties during the complaint process, the AskGamblers Complaint Team reached the conclusion that Crazy Fox Casino management acted in accordance with their Terms and Conditions.

Based on the abovementioned information, the AskGamblers Complaint Team considers this case resolved and it is now officially closed. While we understand this might not be the outcome expected by the complainant, we would like to remind you that, in case of a disagreement with our decision, further assistance on the matter could be requested from the relevant regulatory body and/or appointed ADR entity.

User name
Dear Askgamblers Team,

We have presented you evidence that the player made withdrawals for more than he deposited. We are waiting for your decision.

Thank you for understanding!

Kindest regards,
Crazy Fox Casino Team
User name loyalty-level-2
Furthermore, I believe it certainly is NOT my fault that my SE request was not handled properly despite me

1- submitting a request for self exclusion via the bobcasino website and
2- emailing bobcasino support directly outlining my reasons due to gambling problems and gave explicit instructions to prevent me from all casinos under the N1 interactive licence. This was a direct email to suppor­t@b­obc­asi­nk.com, not a reply to an automated message!

This issue has solely been caused by Bobcasino not handling my SE request properly , I should never have been allowed to deposit any sums with CrazyFox. Therefore because of this breakdown in communication between bobcasino and CrazyFox, the so called “responsible gambling policy” of N1 interactive has severely failed me, a vulnerable player that was trying to protect myself. Thus the onus falls onto N1 interactive as a whole, specifically CrazyFox casino.
User name loyalty-level-2
You are directly responsible as you operate under the same N1 Interactive MGA licence, same as bobcasino. Your casino allowed me to open a casino account and deposit large sums whilst a SE was in place and I explicitly requested to apply this across the Whole N1 interactive casino network.

The breakdown of communication between bobcasino and CrazyFox casino , is not my concern, I followed the guidance to exclude myself via the website and contacted bob casino suppor­­t(­s­u­pp­­ort­­@b­o­b­ca­­sin­­o.com) to outline my gambling issue both by using the automated service AND emailing with my reason outlining my gambling problem AND requesting to be blocked from all casinos under the N1 interactive licence. If bobcasino support has mishandled my request that is out of my hands and completely out of my control as far I was aware my SE was supposed to be in place.

As per MGA regulation you are obliged to follow a players request to SE , especially when it’s been highlighted a gambling problem is present.

I think it’s absolutely crazy you have allowed this to happen CrazyFox, and the fact that MasonSlots and N1Casino, whom are both under the N1 interactive licence, same as Crazy fox, have recognised this major issue and agreed to refund.. what makes you different??

@Askgamblers team if you could step in here.
AF235CE4-6449-44AE-A4BB-BC984FE8F580.png

Crazy Fox Casino Beschwerde-Statistik

Gelöst 5 / 5
Durchschn. Betrag $8,974
Durchschn. Dauer 29 Tage
Durchschn. Antwortzeit 17 Stunden

Crazy Fox Casino Beschwerden

Alle eingegangenen Beschwerden ansehen