603090569

Ok - I get your point so can place a new review which demonstrates my points with facts (I.e how much I spent, the volume of spins etc) to give an idea of my experience on each of the games. It is fair to say though that there are slight double standards between what I should provide as evidence to my “opinion” and what a casino should provide to back up its RTP stats before that is considered as fact.

So my review gave my opinion that although equivalent RTP was presented for Blueprint games than that of other casino sites, I really strongly felt the actual payouts when playing via WH to be really poor (I went through a lot of spins too). I also suggested that based on the wagering requirements that I felt the bonus was generous, but that it served more as a way of trying the site, rather than a sure thing in terms of winning some withdrawable cash. I can’t see where this would breach policy and warrant removal (unless I’m being an idiot and missing something).

Hey is anyone able to help me work out why my WH Vegas review was removed? Looking to make sure my future reviews fit what is required.