Complaint status

Complaint History

probarts submitted a complaint.

Royal Apollo Casino responded.

probarts responded.

Royal Apollo Casino responded.

probarts responded.

Royal Apollo Casino responded.

probarts responded.

probarts responded.

Closed due to inactivity of Royal Apollo Casino.

AskGamblers responded.



Bonus Winnings

Posted: 4th June 2010, 11:36 AM by probarts

I received a bonus from this casino and managed to get the playthrough. I then went on leave a couple of weeks after this. I came back from leave and recently put in a withdrawal. My payout was denied as they said that 3 other people were registered on my computer. When i went on leave i asked my brother to look after my house. It appears that he, his daughter and his sister-in-law played on my computer while i was gone. He had registered the afore mentioned people from HIS computer and only played on mine when he came to feed the pets (as i have a faster internet connection). Not one of their details (address, tel no., name, date of birth etc., etc) are the same as mine as he lives about 15km away from me. It also appears that they were registered long after i had completed my promotion as i had told him that I had won. According to law I have kept my part of the deal and abided by their T&C (1 player per bonus per household) I also made sure about this by regularly contacting live help and making certain that this was the case (even after successful completion of the above mentioned bonus). If I had withdrawn the money a week or two after this, I would have had no problem as none of the above persons had been registered yet. They also had no complaints when I deposited my money (ZAR 250) in order to claim the above bonus money. It would be greatly appreciated if you could look into the above matter.

Royal Apollo Casino

Hi AskGamblers,

My name is Linda and I am the casino Manager, I personally looked into the issue and indeed the players as the player wrote 3 different players registered from his PC and IP.

As we all know fraudulent activity as common in online gaming and this players activities fall under that criteria ,, not only in our casino , but in many other online gaming operations.

Our main concern is to make sure that only player that satisfy our T&C (1 player per bonus per household) earn a right to a bonus (this reduces the possibility of fraudulency and makes sure that the majority of players are not hurt ).

We refunded the player is security deposit and the casino as no obligation to the player as he (admittedly) says that more then one person registered.

In regards to his "story" about his daughter and sister in law , registering under other users , that doesn’t seem to be the case as this is not a simple task, they needed to have some computer knowledge to remove registry settings and download the client again all in order to do a fresh register as a new user…. A little far fetched I think.

Thanks,

Linda
Casino Manager

My name is Linda and I am the casino Manager, I personally looked into the issue and indeed the players as the player wrote 3 different players registered from his PC and IP.

I did not say that 3 players registered from my PC

As we all know fraudulent activity as common in online gaming and this players activities fall under that criteria, not only in our casino, but in many other online gaming operations.

How can she jump to this conclusion? In fact i have started checking up on what did happen on my computer while i was away. This lady has now stopped all bonuses at all the rival casinos on my username. Seems to be an act of revenge?

Our main concern is to make sure that only player that satisfy our T&C (1 player per bonus per household) earn a right to a bonus (this reduces the possibility of fraudulency and makes sure that the majority of players are not hurt ).

At last she admits, 1 player per bonus per household. This is the case here as no other player is registered with my address, tel no, date of birth. In fact you will see that half the rival casinos are register under my wifes name (lrobarts) and half under mine, but not once are we both registered at 1 casino.

We refunded the player is security deposit and the casino as no obligation to the player as he (admittedly) says that more then one person registered.

They did refund, which i withdrew to my Moneybookers account (2 days later and it is still in the casino) According to live help, management must first approve my withdrawal. I wonder who is collecting the interest? I never admitted tomore than 1 person being registered.

In regards to his "story" about his daughter and sister in law, registering under other users, that doesn’t seem to be the case as this is not a simple task, they needed to have some computer knowledge to remove registry settings and download the client again all in order to do a fresh register as a new user…. A little far fetched I think.

Once again, i feel that this person did not investigate the matter herself, otherwise she would have seen that i said my brothers daughter and sister-in-law. I also said that they had registered from HIS home and not mine. under their own names and not other names Further comment: This is a case of trying not to pay what is legally due to me. Still withholding my security deposit. Twisting my words and somebody else investigating and giving the wrong information to the casino manager. Or no investigation was done and responding to what they "think" happened.

Royal Apollo Casino

I did not say that 3 players registered from my PC

you didn’t say that exactly . but you did write " It appears that he, his daughter and his sister-in-law played on my computer while i was gone." Indicating the likelihood of that there can be 3 different registrants from your computer

How can she jump to this conclusion? In fact i have started checking up on what did happen on my computer while i was away. This lady has now stopped all bonuses at all the rival casinos on my username. Seems to be an act of revenge?

Not at all here is what are records show that happened.
From your computer you have 3 different registered users

User1 (that one that you deposited with) signed up on 10-03-17 and received a very high no-deposit bonus which he didn’t use

User2 signed up on the 2010-05-07 again through the same affiliate that offer a very high no deposit bonus …. First sign of possible fraud – A players tries to claim 2 very high no deposit bonus from same site (we denied promotion from user2 )

User 3 signed up from User1 computer on 2010-05-18 , again from the same affiliate website offering large no deposit bonus, this time the user was able to avoid our security filters and receive the no deposit bonus

(clearly breaching out T&C about multiple promotions per house hold)

Yes we consider the same PC household especially that all 3 user came from the exactly same affiliate

This proofs without a doubt that this is fraudulent activity and you have breached our T&C

First of all, they did not answer to all my responses.

We seem to now be getting to the true crux of the matter. They had 2 responses, the first one was, not admitting that they really got their facts wrong, but stating i did not say that exactly. Then they just repeat what i said. Still no valid explanation.

Not at all here is what are records show that happened. From your computer you have 3 different registered users User1 (that one that you deposited with) signed up on 10-03-17 and received a very high no-deposit bonus which he didn't use User2 signed up on the 2010-05-07 again through the same affiliate that offer a very high no deposit bonus …. First sign of possible fraud – A players tries to claim 2 very high no deposit bonus from same site (we denied promotion from user2 ) User 3 signed up from User1 computer on 2010-05-18 , again from the same affiliate website offering large no deposit bonus, this time the user was able to avoid our security filters and receive the no deposit bonus (clearly breaching out T&C about multiple promotions per house hold) Yes we consider the same PC household especially that all 3 user came from the exactly same affiliate This proofs without a doubt that this is fraudulent activity and you have breached our T&C.

USER1 is my username. I now see that USER2 was registered nearly 2 months after i had completed my Bonus playthrough and USER3 11 days after USER2. No attempt was made by either USER2 or USER3 to claim any winnings.

On this point they still are not answering my question, but only repeating what i did say, namely:

It appears that he, his daughter and his sister-in-law played on my computer while i was gone. He had registered the afore mentioned people from HIS computer and only played on mine when he came to feed the pets (as i have a faster internet connection). Not one of their details (address, tel no., name, date of birth etc., etc) are the same as mine as he lives about 15km away from me. It also appears that they were registered long after i had completed my promotion as i had told him that I had won. According to law I have kept my part of the deal and abided by their T&C (1 player per bonus per household) I also made sure about this by regularly contacting live help and making certain that this was the case (even after successful completion of the above mentioned bonus). If I had withdrawn the money a week or two after this, I would have had no problem as none of the above persons had been registered yet.

Another valid point is that, in their response they say "possible fraud", but end it off by stating "without a doubt that this is fraudulent activity". Which is it?

Royal Apollo Casino

USER1 is my username. I now see that USER2 was registered nearly 2 months after i had completed my Bonus playthrough

No this is not true you , you only completed the playthrough in the bonus of user1 AFTER you registered with user 2 and user 3 (which you received a no deposit bonus which you used)

Another valid point is that, in their response they say "possible fraud", but end it off by stating "without a doubt that this is fraudulent activity". Which is it?

You are a fraudulent player that tried and succeeded in claiming 2 bonuses with 2 different logins. Which clearly no allowed by our T&C, this issue is closed from our end.

Hi, Please sort this casino out now and charge them with FRAUD!!! I have got enough proof to do this.

No this is not true you, you only completed the playthrough in the bonus of user1 AFTER you registered with user 2 and user 3 (which you received a no deposit bonus which you used)

I started playing the bonus immediately after claiming it and did the playthrough in about 2 days. A couple of weeks after this i went on leave and only claimed when i got back. I xferred the R250 (for the security deposit) to moneybookers on the 15/5. Due to the bank addressing me as Peter (my 2nd) name and not galileo (my first name) Moneybookers informed me on the 18/5 that i would have to get a letter to just confirm that i am registered at the bank as G.P.C. Robarts, but in all correspondence they refer to me as Peter. Then they would clear the money into my Moneybookers account. I only did this after some time as i am a very busy person.

Now we come to the very interesting part, which proves that the casino is fraudulent: I sent my verification documents, as they are required for withdrawal purposes on the 16/5 both to faxback@royalapollo.com and to support@royalapollo.com.

1. Why send these through weeks before the completion of the bonus, as they now say?

2. Why send the R250 deposit to Moneybookers also weeks before completing the bonus?

It gets worse (for them). I just went into my account now and my history has been changed to show that i only played on the 1/6? Please notice the times and i am sure that i can prove that i had a couple of clients that i interviewed that day. I can also get a site activity report for that day from my internet supplier, to prove that i was not on that site at all. Maybe only for a minute or 2 to check if my money was in yet.

This is the biggest case of fraud that i have ever seen. I have all the documentation, email, banks statements and moneybookers records to prove this.

You are welcome to go into my royalapollo account (***********) and have a look at this before they change anything else.

Hi, sorry to bother you. I just noticed that i did play on 1/6, but that was with the deposit money i was playing with (no bonuses). If they said that i was busy with my bonus playthrough, look at the times. Withdrawal was at 04:16, but i started playing at about 04:45. How can i have been busy with the playthrough if i had already withdrawn the money?

Royal Apollo Casino is closed permanently.

Leave your comment about this complaint

Lucky13 reviewed On 06/28/2010

Useful information that just arrived in our inbox:

"Dear affiliates,

Due to the ongoing issues we are having with processing and Rival management we will be closing down our site in the next few days. We are committed to providing top standards of gaming and support to both players and affiliates.

This decision was not easy, but the ongoing issues are not allowing us to offer these standards.

Please terminate all affiliate deals within the immediate , we hope (we can't enforce this as its Rival that holds all fees), that Rival will respect and honor the current and future revenue that you are entitled to.

Thank your,

Michael and Emma,
Royal Apollo Affiliates"

scuter reviewed On 06/15/2010

I'm afraid it's easier said than done old boy :(

Until enough people care enough, nothing will change....

probarts reviewed On 06/14/2010

scuter said:


Unfortunately, AskGamblers.com is only as powerful as us gamblers make it. Which is why I'm posting here, to lend one more voice to the court of public opinion [the only court to which most of these casinos will ever be held accountable].

Where AskGamblers.com impresses me as opposed to the range of other "player advocacy" websites - and I really must stress this is my opinion only - is that the others are all equally powerless, but even worse, they are almost all casino [NOT player] advocates.

I have tested them all and they have all failed. With the exception of AskGamblers.com - which, whilst currently weak [at least until more lend their voice in support], at least came through the test untainted by corruption.

Online casinos will always be licensed in places like Costa Rica and Curacao for this very reason. It is up to us [the sum total of gamblers] to 'unionise' I suppose, and together we can put pressure on casinos to do the right thing - in their own self-interest.


Right, Lets get something going and start cleaning up these casinos. You can email me at probarts@telkomsa.net. Lets get the ball rolling!!!

scuter reviewed On 06/14/2010

Unfortunately, AskGamblers.com is only as powerful as us gamblers make it. Which is why I'm posting here, to lend one more voice to the court of public opinion [the only court to which most of these casinos will ever be held accountable].

Where AskGamblers.com impresses me as opposed to the range of other "player advocacy" websites - and I really must stress this is my opinion only - is that the others are all equally powerless, but even worse, they are almost all casino [NOT player] advocates.

I have tested them all and they have all failed. With the exception of AskGamblers.com - which, whilst currently weak [at least until more lend their voice in support], at least came through the test untainted by corruption.

Online casinos will always be licensed in places like Costa Rica and Curacao for this very reason. It is up to us [the sum total of gamblers] to 'unionise' I suppose, and together we can put pressure on casinos to do the right thing - in their own self-interest.

probarts reviewed On 06/14/2010

scuter said:


Hi probarts, unfortunately what I was hinting at with the below will prevent you from taking them to court.

I have just read RoyalApollo's Terms and you must understand that Linda is only posting here as a courtesy. The terms are poorly written, but they do state: " In the event of any dispute regarding a wager or Winnings, Our decision will be final and binding." They then later contradict themselves: "The construction, validity and performance of this Agreement will be governed by the laws of England and the courts of London shall have exclusive jurisdiction." Sounds like a UK magistrate will decide what is 'final' and 'binding'. But then another contradiction: "Bonne Chance NV is a company incorporated, licensed and regulated by the Government of Curacao."

What this means in reality, that that they are lying about being held accountable in any UK court. They are 'licensed' in Curacao which, along with Costa Rica, are the two worst licensing areas. Effectively, they answer to nobody except themselves.

Which is why I took pains to explain that Linda was only posting out of courtesy. Online casinos in Costa Rica and Curacao and even in Malta [I have evidence of this] are laws unto themselves.



Hi scuter, thanks.
There must be a way we can stop these guys? I did do everything by the book and saw that the one USER was only registered by my computer. This USER just registered but did not play here. On this one they denied the bonus. The other 2 were registered at different locations, not even from my computer! Only the Surname is the same (obviously, because it is family) They are clutching at straws. Is there nothing that Askgambler can do further?

scuter reviewed On 06/14/2010

Hi probarts, unfortunately what I was hinting at with the below will prevent you from taking them to court.

I have just read RoyalApollo's Terms and you must understand that Linda is only posting here as a courtesy. The terms are poorly written, but they do state: " In the event of any dispute regarding a wager or Winnings, Our decision will be final and binding." They then later contradict themselves: "The construction, validity and performance of this Agreement will be governed by the laws of England and the courts of London shall have exclusive jurisdiction." Sounds like a UK magistrate will decide what is 'final' and 'binding'. But then another contradiction: "Bonne Chance NV is a company incorporated, licensed and regulated by the Government of Curacao."

What this means in reality, that that they are lying about being held accountable in any UK court. They are 'licensed' in Curacao which, along with Costa Rica, are the two worst licensing areas. Effectively, they answer to nobody except themselves.

Which is why I took pains to explain that Linda was only posting out of courtesy. Online casinos in Costa Rica and Curacao and even in Malta [I have evidence of this] are laws unto themselves.

probarts reviewed On 06/14/2010

Hi scuter, thanks for your comments.

1. All 4 users have got different addresses and live about 15 Km from me, not from same household.

2. I did reach the requirements (playthrough) long before anybody else had registered from my computer. This in itself is binding by law. Both parties upheld their end of the agreement.

3. Why not inform all users that a bonus for that household has already been claimed, before asking for security deposit?

4. I just feel that this casino has not investigated all aspects regarding this issue.

5. How can the casino attack my integrity? Then i am allowed to do the same?

6. I am going to take this matter to court, because i feel that this has been done to many players all over the world. Costs do not bother me as i can handle my own case (after all i am legally qualified - Advocate) and know what contracts and agreements are all about.

scuter reviewed On 06/11/2010

probarts, you're not doing yourself any favours here - you must remain calm. You are emotional and that is understandable. But you absolutely MUST get your facts straight before you make statements or you risk losing credibility. I am almost always on the player's side first but you are currently making it very hard to support you. I am leaning with the casino on this one but - but if you are willing to allow me to try and help you - I am 100% sure I can assist in explaining your side more clearly to RoyalApollo. But we cannot do that if you attack them with wild allegations supported only by flimsy 'evidence'.

I have just read RoyalApollo's Terms and you must understand that Linda is only posting here as a courtesy. The terms are poorly written, but they do state: " In the event of any dispute regarding a wager or Winnings, Our decision will be final and binding. They then later contradict themselves: "The construction, validity and performance of this Agreement will be governed by the laws of England and the courts of London shall have exclusive jurisdiction. Sounds like a UK magistrate will decide what is 'final' and 'binding'. But then another contradiction: "Bonne Chance NV is a company incorporated, licensed and regulated by the Government of Curacao.

What does this all mean for you? I'm afraid it means if your winnings are the most important thing to you, you must start being a great deal more diplomatic. If you are willing to forfeit your winnings, we can achieve only a small 'moral' victory at best. I have had many moral victories. They are hollow, I assure you.

And at the end of the day, you really do have your in-laws to blame for this I'm afraid. Unless they all live in three separate houses, which I'm sure is not the case.

Linda / RoyalApollo - I am unrelated to AskGamblers [merely a spectator], but thank you for being willing to address this issue in the public arena. If you would afford me this courtesy, I am confident I can mediate in a fair and unbiased manner. Of course, this is merely a favour I request of you.

RoyalApollo stated: "From your computer you have 3 different registered users
User1 (that one that you deposited with) signed up on 10-03-17 and received a very high no-deposit bonus which he didn’t use
User2 signed up on the 2010-05-07 again through the same affiliate that offer a very high no deposit bonus... (we denied promotion from user2 )
User 3 signed up from User1 computer on 2010-05-18 this time the user was able to avoid our security filters and receive the no deposit bonus"

I believe the key issue is underlined above.

1. probarts, do you deny this statement from RoyalApollo? If you do, where did each of the four users register their account from?

Sidenote: RoyalApollo, there is no logic in your theories regarding affiliate sites. Yes, a multi-accounter *might* do that - but only if they were very foolish. The theory is valueless because family and friends will likely all come through the same link also.
"Where did you hear about this promotion?" "Askgamblers.com!! I won $200!!"
Those issues only serve to confuse matters. We should focus on the key issues of IPs and how exactly four players from the same family all opened accounts from two computers and ended up all accessing their accounts from one of those computers whilst three of them came over to feed the pets.


2. RoyalApollo: Are you able to say how exactly User3 bypassed your security mechanisms to claim the promotion from the same computer?

3. RoyalApollo: And did all four register with four separate addresses?

Write your Review

In order to be able to write comments, you need to sign up for an account first. Click here to sign up now!

After sign up process is complete, you will be automatically returned to this page.